https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00483-1
Research
Circuit-based vs. measurement-based quantum computing: a comparative analysis, layered metrics, and decision flow for approach selection
1
Department of Scientific Computing, Pukyong National University, 48513, Busan, Republic of Korea
2
School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 40116, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
a
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
1
August
2025
Accepted:
16
February
2026
Published online:
27
February
2026
Abstract
Circuit-based quantum computing (CBQC), also known as the gate model, is currently regarded as the leading paradigm for performing quantum computation and has garnered widespread interest due to its relatively better-established implementation and close intuitive resemblance to classical computation. However, an alternative model that solely utilizes single-qubit measurements on entangled states to perform computation, namely the measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC), has started to attract further research interest as it is deemed more naturally suited for certain quantum hardware architectures, though its actual implementation remains largely underexplored. Recently, there have been preliminary efforts to characterize the specific regimes in which MBQC may potentially be more advantageous compared to CBQC. Nevertheless, a more systematic assessment is necessary to assess the suitability of each model across a broader range of more practical cases. In this work, we present a detailed comparative analysis of CBQC and MBQC, beginning with reviewing the theoretical foundations of each model before highlighting its distinguishing features that set the two paradigms apart. Furthermore, building on previous work, we propose a generalized regime analysis that more accurately captures the conditions under which a given quantum algorithm is more favorably executed in MBQC or CBQC. Subsequently, we identify critical parameters that likely determine whether a quantum algorithm is better suited to CBQC or MBQC, categorizing detailed key factors and performance metrics into layers of quantum computation. Next, we propose a decision flow that, given specific hardware constraints and algorithm requirements, guides the selection to the most appropriate model, discussing suitability in two representative worked examples of quantum algorithm applications: Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) and Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQE). Last, we discuss the potential to combine both models as a hybrid approach to leverage the best of both worlds and explore its benefits for practical quantum computing applications.
Key words: Circuit-based quantum computing / Comparative analysis / Decision flow / Measurement-based quantum computing / Review
© The Author(s) 2026
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
